The Best Leaf Blower

We examined quite a few further blowers and dismissed others earlier than the testing section.

Corded blowers

DeWalt’s DWBL700 12-amp handheld blower was a earlier runner-up choose that supplied premium options at a premium value (sometimes over $100). We choose the low price and excessive efficiency of each the Toro F700 and the Worx WG520, and we predict most individuals might be happy with what these fashions provide.

The Black+Decker BV6600 High Performance Blower/Vacuum/Mulcher is a pleasant blower, and we like that it has a mulching operate. However its leaf-blasting capacity was simply not on a par with that of the Toro F700 or the Worx WG520 in our exams.

Though the Toro 51619 Ultra Blower/Vac is a well-liked mannequin, it has a tedious system for switching out the decreasing nozzles that requires the elimination of your entire blowing tube and the guard that protects the underside of the blower. On high of that, the variable-speed knob is so removed from the deal with that you could function it with a second hand.

Toro additionally sells the 51621 UltraPlus Blower/Vac, which we examined as properly. It seems to be the identical because the 51619 besides that it has a further piece to help leaf shredding, in addition to an oscillating nozzle. It didn’t examine to the Toro F700 or the Worx WG520 in general energy.

The Worx WG510 Turbine Fusion Leaf Blower, Mulcher & Yard Vacuum is just like the Worx WG520 besides that it’s much less highly effective and outfitted with a shredder/vac operate. Sadly, it’s solely a two-speed blower with no nozzle reducer, so you’ve gotten much less flexibility round flower beds.

The Stihl BGE 61 prices greater than the Toro F700 and Worx WG520 and doesn’t seem to have their air-moving energy.

Cordless blowers

About $100 cheaper than our cordless blower choose, the Ego LB5302 is an possibility when you’re okay settling for much less energy and half the runtime of our choose. However we predict the additional energy and comfort of the bigger battery is price the additional price for most individuals.

The Greenworks BL80L2510 80V Jet Electric Leaf Blower is analogous sufficient in energy to our Ego cordless choose, however the run time in our exams was a disappointing 22 minutes. It sometimes prices $250. We choose the premium run time of the Ego LB5804 or the worth of the Ryobi RY40460.

The Ryobi RY40440 40V Brushless Backpack Blower, with its 5 Ah battery, lasted 22 minutes however didn’t appear to have a complete lot extra energy than the Ego mannequin we advocate. It has two battery ports, so you may drop a second battery in and it’ll run on them sequentially for an extended whole run time. It’s a pleasant characteristic, but it surely requires a buy-in on the Ryobi cordless system.

Though the Worx WG591 Turbine 56V Cordless Leaf Blower has nice energy, the run time merely wasn’t there in our exams. A completely charged battery lasted solely 9 minutes.

We additionally examined the Ego LB6002 Power+ 600 CFM Backpack Blower, which obtained about 26 minutes on full energy. It at the moment prices about $300. There’s no query that the backpack gives comfort in dealing with Ego’s giant and heavy 5.zero Ah battery, however we’re not satisfied that the load shift of the backpack is important for lower than a half hour of blower run time.

The Oregon BL300 had a brief run time of simply over 13 minutes on excessive.

We examined the Kobalt 80 V Lithium-Ion Cordless Blower, and we discovered it to be highly effective however hamstrung by an 8-minute run time. The GreenWorks GBL80300 Cordless Brushless Blower is the very same device.

The Ryobi RY40411 40V Jet Fan Blower was the least highly effective of the cordless blowers we examined. We preferred its easy variable-speed set off, however this mannequin supplied much less energy than the others and had issues shifting any important quantity of leaves.

Stihl additionally has a cordless blower, the BGA 85, however we didn’t check it as a result of its exorbitant value. Simply the device alone, with no battery or charger, at the moment prices about $300. To get the remainder of the package deal, you could drop one other $200, making it a $500 buy.

We didn’t check the Makita XBU02PT Lithium-Ion Brushless Cordless Blower, the DeWalt DCBL772X1 60V Max FlexVolt Brushless Handheld Axial Blower, or the Greenworks BPB80L2510 80V Backpack Blower. Judging from their low run occasions in a latest Popular Mechanics check, we decided that they’d be unlikely to match our picks’ efficiency.

Gasoline blowers

We examined the Stihl BR 200 small backpack blower, and though our landscapers preferred the ability, they didn’t just like the noise. The BR 200 set free a high-pitched, ear-withering squeal that was inconceivable to disregard even with our listening to safety on. The BR 200 additionally sometimes sells for $50 greater than the similar-size Husqvarna 130BT. Given the noise, Kevin Walker’s crew discovered that added price arduous to justify.

At first, Walker and his crew preferred the appears to be like of the Ryobi RY08420A 42cc Backpack Blower, praising it for its ergonomics and normal ease of use. That, mixed with constructive critiques from Fashionable Mechanics and different websites, led us to decide on this mannequin as a finances choose in our 2014 information. Sadly, this blower has not held up properly throughout long-term testing: After only some months of utilizing this mannequin, Walker reported, his crew started to keep away from it as a result of issues beginning a scorching engine.

We additionally examined the midsize Husqvarna 350BT however discovered it missing subsequent to our gasoline advice, the Stihl BR 350. Past the truth that the 350BT wasn’t as robust because the BR 350, it additionally had a number of design points that the landscapers identified. They instantly recognized the knob that tightens the joystick management in place as a weak level. “Those things are just bad,” Justin mentioned. “I have to retighten mine every day.” Kevin Walker additionally confirmed me the 2 unprotected wires within the engine: “Those will get caught on a branch and pulled right out,” he mentioned. “I have no idea why they’re not in a sleeve like the other wires.”

A view of an old worn Husqvarna 350BT
Kevin Walker’s outdated Husqvarna 350BT. Be aware that the joystick is taped into place (the tightening knob now not works), the tube extensions are taped collectively, and a wire tie on the higher finish of the blowing tube is trying to safe the management wire. “These are the things that go wrong with leaf blowers,” the landscaper informed us. Picture: Doug Mahoney

We additionally had issues securing the blower tubes on the 350BT. Husqvarna fashions include 4 lengths of tube relatively than three, giving them a further 5 inches of size. That’s good for tall folks, however when the connections aren’t nice, the blower tube picks up a large wobble. We had this problem solely with the bigger Husqvarna and never with the smaller 130BT.

We didn’t check the now-discontinued Echo PB-500 (comparable with the midsize backpack blowers) as a result of Fashionable Mechanics’s Roy Berendsohn ranked it under the Husqvarna 350BT. Of all of the fashions we thought-about, the PB-500 had the bottom rankings on the Residence Depot website.

Bigger blowers, such because the Stihl BR 600, can be found, however Walker informed us that the added energy of such fashions is pointless when you’re correctly shifting leaves with a tarp.

Gasoline handheld blowers

We don’t advocate gasoline handheld blowers. Right here’s why: On common, gasoline handhelds weigh round 10 kilos, making them 2 to 3 kilos heavier than related corded fashions. Blowing leaves can take some time, and swinging and pivoting a gasoline engine at arm’s size for 30 or 40 minutes is troublesome to do. So if you need to go gasoline, a backpack mannequin is healthier; you get not less than the identical energy (and often extra), maintain the limitless portability of a gasoline engine, and achieve a lot better ergonomics.

About the Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *